One of the great questions we face is when to take a stand.
Most issues are very personal so it’s very difficult for
an organization to take a stance on something that that may be important to
some and not important to others. Preservation of important historical work has
always been a contentious area among ASGCA members because not all of us share
the same perspective. Some think evolution is important and others like me
would rather see the most important works preserved for future generations to
study.
While I may not personally like what some architects
choose to do with historical courses, I had never seen a proposal so egregious
that I thought we as an organization needed to take a stand. Until now. The latest proposal for
renovations to the Old Course in my opinion crosses that line. While I’d prefer
they let well alone, it is not the entire proposal that compels me to write
this letter. It is the desire to alter the contours of the land. Any change to
the undulations or green contours shows a complete disregard for St. Andrew’s
hallowed ground.
I’m not foolish enough to believe any course should be
locked in time or not allowed to make change, but recommending changes to the
ground contours and green contours of The Old Course is a travesty.
The architecture of the Old Course represents the
wellspring for all of golf course architecture. Almost every exceptional idea
brought by a future generation has a direct link back to the Old Course. In
particular the Eden hole with its magnificent green is perhaps the single most
copied hole in the history of the game. All the great architects who visited
St. Andrews have made mention of the qualities and attributes of the Eden Hole
and yet three men propose to toss this legacy aside to accommodate a tournament
that comes for one week in every five years.
This is a breach of the Public Trust and something we
must ask them to reconsider
Yours sincerely,
Ian Andrew
The only way for this madness to stop is for all the architecture societies to openly question the work.
Yours sincerely,
Ian Andrew
The only way for this madness to stop is for all the architecture societies to openly question the work.
Ian,
ReplyDeleteExcellent letter, let's hope it resonates with a healthy majority of the membership.
Ian
ReplyDeleteI fully endorse exactly your position as breaching the line of altering green complexes and ground contours is where the architectural damage is the most worrisome.
Bill Vostinak